|
|
|
|
|
Diagnosis Accuracy in Electric Power Apparatus
Conditions Using Classification Methods
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hideo Hirose and
Faisal Zaman
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IEEE Trans., Dielectrics
and Electrical Insulation, Vol.17, No.1, pp. 271-279 (2010.2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
The use of the decision tree method was recommended as a classification
tool in diagnosing electric power apparatus because it provides
the visible if-then rule, making it possible to connect the physical
phenomena with the observed signals. Using a variety of feature
variables extracted from the partial discharge patterns and others,
the misclassification rates were found to be as small as 2% if
results were obtained using training data only. In this paper,
we assess the diagnosing accuracy of the classification methods
using test data; we have found that the small values of the misclassification
rates remain even when test data are applied. The appropriate
methods perform fairly well, with misclassification rates of
less than 5%. We conclude that although the misclassification
rates by the decision tree are not as small as the values obtained
by effective ensemble classifiers such as bagging and boosting,
the decision tree is still useful and attractive because the
method provides explicit rules, and the variability of the misclassification
rates is not very large.
|
|
|
|
|
Condition diagnosis, classification, decision
tree, diagnosis accuracy, misclassification rate, test data,
ensemble methods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Times Cited in Web of Science: 3
Times Cited in Google Scholar: 8
Cited in Books:
WoS: IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER
DELIVERY 巻: 26 号: 4 ページ: 2380-2390 DOI: 10.1109/TPWRD.2011.2162858
発行: OCT 2011; IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON DIELECTRICS AND ELECTRICAL
INSULATION 巻: 18 号: 5 ページ: 1584-1590 発行: OCT 2011;
Others:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|